A Question of Philosophy
(author unknown)
A few years ago, we were
employing IRS Form 1099-OID by naming the strawparty as
the “Recipient” and the de facto entity as the Payer.
Roger Elvick used that very method in the case that landed him
in prison. More recently, the Zero Your Account (“ZYA”) method
for bringing the Individual Master File / social security record
to a zero balance has employed the OID form by naming the
strawparty as “Payer” and the de facto entity as
“Recipient.” And even more recently, a method which uses a
1099-A which names the strawparty as the Lender in conjunction
with a 1099-OID which names the strawparty as the recipient has
appeared and, as of this writing, has shown promise for
resolving Court cases and providing a substantial return of
funds to the Source (the living Man/Woman).
PHILOSOPHY OF ZYA
The philosophy of ZYA is
simple. Living men have prepaid the entire de facto
concoction with the loss of the Land in 1865 and the transfer of
all wealth to the United States federal corporation and
subjugation of free-holding rights in 1933. This mega-pool of
credit is used to fund the abomination and production of all
goods and services thereunder. The correct economic model
therefore for a simple retail purchase would be to visit the
store and have the value of the requisitioned goods set-off
against Our credit. But since it does not work that way, since
living Men are forced to “pay” for goods and services they have
already funded, we seek a refund of the “payment.” The invoice
or billing amount with which we are served is the fiction value
that is attributed to the amount of our credit that was used to
produce the good or service. Since U.S. Inc. paid nothing for
the gain and is charging us the invoice amount, that invoice
amount comprises the Original Issue Discount – the amount that
they will gain when we “pay” them minus the cost of the credit
to produce the good or service (which was $0.00).
In banking situations, we
approach a licensed credit bearer (bank) for the purpose of
buying back our own goods – a house or a car for instance.
Since the bank claims to be “loaning” us value of some sort, and
we supplied all of that value when our money was confiscated by
deception in 1933 under the Communist Roosefesto, in effect the
bank is charging us for access to our own credit. So we are
injured twice – when we purchase the car and when we pay the
bank the usury rape tax. Therefore, since the bank’s investment
was $0.00 and they are making value equal to the principal and
interest of the loan, the Original Issue Discount is equal to
the face value of the contract plus any payments that were made.
Under ZYA, the author suggests
that the OID amount is listed in Box #1 and noted as a federal
withholding in Box #4. Those amounts are then transferred to
the cover form, Form 1096. Simple and neat.
Form 1096
is especially revealing because it asks, remarkably, for the EIN
and social security number of the filer which has been
interpreted to mean it is asking for information about the
living man’s live account and the fiction’s dead corporate
account, although implies that these boxes are provided to
accommodate individual OR corporate “filers.”
That total amount as listed on
the 1096 is then transferred to Lines 21, 22, 37, 38, 41
and 43 on IRS Form 1040 as Taxable Income. And on the
very next line, Line 44, the Tax on that income is listed as
$0.00 so that a refund of the full OID can be sought on Line 74a
(all lines from 2007 Form 1040). This is the primary
concern of those who are now using the older method as they
believe such a filing could lead to fraud charges or an audit.
Proponents of ZYA simply call
attention to the following:
1.
The tax is
stated to be voluntary and is known to be self-assessing. A
living man can elect to assess a zero amount.
2.
The living
man is not a corporation and hence not taxable. Interestingly,
the 1040 does NOT state “Your” Taxable Income. It only states
“Taxable Income” on Line 43. But on Line 63 the form states:
“This is your tax.” You admit to the tax. They get to retain
the gain.
3.
The purpose
of all of these filings is to present the distinction between
the living and straw parties. Form 1040 is being used to
identify withheld funds. Period.
4.
Form 56
(see below).
PHILOSOPHY OF THE ORIGINAL
METHOD
The philosophy of the original
method is similar to the above as far as pre-payment and being
blocked from accessing our own credit. However, in the original
method, the tax on Line 43 is completed by looking up the
applicable tax on a tax table, and then subtracting the tax from
the OID to arrive at the applicable refund.
PHILOSOPHY OF THE 1099-A
METHOD
This method was designed by two
very clever men who researched IRS codes and regs (especially
Publication 1212, 26 U.S.C. Secs. 1271 – 1275, and Chapter 33A
of American Jurisprudence 2d, pages 695 – 715. It is intended
to identify the living man as the “sponsor of the credit.” A
1099-A is used to identify the court or bank as the borrower of
funds that have been abandoned. When U.S. Inc. failed to redeem
the notes which signified their debt to the Sovereigns (FRNS),
the 1099-A identifies the value of the case or original mortgage
note as the amount of the credit that has been abandoned. This
is a simple system in which a simple Affidavit of Original Issue
with Exhibits A and B (photocopy of Copy B of court’s 1099-OID;
photocopy of Copy B of 1099-A) is filed in the case, with
another original sent to the Plaintiff/prosecutor with Exhibits
A and B (photocopy of Copy B of Plaintiff’s 1099-OID; photocopy
of Copy B of 1099-A). It has succeeded in achieving abandonment
of all civil court cases in which it’s been tired and various
refunds. CAUTION: DO NOT EXTRAPOLATE A SILVER BULLET.
Many such technologies have succeeded at first and then been
stone-walled.
WHICH OF THESE METHODS TO
CHOOSE, however, is less a function of any of the above
information and more a function of:
Faith in the Creator
And
Willingness to persevere
It has been suggested that the
Secretary of the Treasury be appointed as fiduciary for all tax
and judicial matters (they are the same issues by the way) on
IRS Form 56. It is not the method, but the Man that
makes the difference. Only the man can stand up and be
counted:
“That’s my understanding. Show
me where I’m wrong.”
“It’s fraud? Don’t you have a
copy of Form 56? If I got it wrong, why are you not correcting
it? Do yiou not have the authority?”
If a Sovereign living Man
receives a Notice of Frivolous Penalty, instead of crying or
quitting or skulking away, he recognizes this as a novation, a
re-draft, a substitution of a new contract for the old contract,
and he celebrates by issuing a corrected set of filings to
institute a return of those additional funds to the Source.
Interest, fees and penalties? Who cares? Here’s another filing
for return to the Source. It is his faith that keeps him true
to the Creator when others fold their cards, tuck tail and run.
He knows that when you accede
to Satan’s promises, Satan will then be able to control his
every move.
A Sovereign living Man holds
his ground and remains consistent with his beliefs and his Faith
regardless of the provocation or the venue (commerce, common
law, Constitution, Articles of Confederation, Original
jurisdiction). The venue other than Original jurisdiction‘s
irrelevant. He knows the Lord said, “fear
not, nor be dismayed; to morrow go out against them: for the
LORD will be with you.” (Chronicles, 20:17). Therefore, when a
Sovereign man hears about the 1099-A method, he will NOT run out
and correct all of his ZYA returns, he will merely continue to
persevere.
Commerce is just another way of
demonstrating who you are. So is common law. So is abatement.
So are declarations of political status. So are David
Clarence’s removals. So are Keith Edwards’s Cancellatura
documents. The pathway to freedom is in you, my friends. Not
on a piece of paper. None of us have complete knowledge.
That’s the way they intend it. Satan does not want to let us
off the hook. But remember, Satan tempted the Savior three
times, and three times Yashewa cast it off using only the Word
of the Father. If you dig in your heals and rely on the word of
the Lord, they cannot talk you out of who you are.
It’s what’s in your heart that matters, the
strength of your faith, the commitment to perseverance. Once
you turn around, you are lost in the kingdom of Satan from which
there is no escape. This is what I believe.
But it’s not the author’s job to convince you
of who you are. It’s up to you to decide. If you do not know,
then you need to dig in and do the research. If you choose to
cough up your breakfast at an email, that’s your private
business. If you choose to see your salvation in the whims of
prosecutors involved in cases unrelated to yours, in the whims
of judges who seem to dishonor your first instrument, in the
exploits of fellow patriots who undertake all sorts of
procedures similar to yours in name only—instead of finding
salvation in the Word of the Lord—that is your private affair.
But I hope you abandon fear and choose the
right team. The commercial processes – all of these processes -
demonstrate to Satan’s disciples that we are Children created in
the image of our Father and we are not going to buy into their
fear. It was our labor and the labor of our forefathers that
created this commercial juggernaut and it is our destiny to
reap the harvest of our labors.
“Now fulfill your duty under the fiduciary
appointment.”
DISCLAIMER . . . . .
We function solely
as a preparation service. Our services are designed to provide
accurate information in regard to the subject matter covered.
All information is transmitted with the understanding that -
We do not give legal or tax advice - and we are not licensed to do
so. If legal advice or other expert assistance is required, the
services of a competent professional should be sought.
Although
every precaution has been taken in the preparation of this
service, the publisher and author assume no liability for errors
and omissions. This service is published without warranty of any
kind, either expressed or implied. Furthermore, neither the
author nor the publisher shall be liable for any damages, either
directly or indirectly arising from the use or misuse of this
service.
